I bought a 20cl sample of Bunnahabhain that had been matured for 14 years in a Pedro Ximenez Noe cask, at the distillery. It was in a dark bottle, so I could not see the colour of the whisky. I expected to see a dark coloured whisky like the Dalmore or Glendronach, but it was light golden. Andrew Brown, distillery manager at Bunnahabhain, told me that the cask was very old and used several times to mature whisky before Bunnahabhain got it. It turned out to be inactive.
So to a comparison between the Bunnahabhain and a Caperdonich 18 years old refill American oak hogshead matured whisky.
First some facts about the whiskies:
1) Bunnahabhain, cask 555, 14 years old, 54.8% abv., Pedro Ximenez Noe sherry butt, bottled 26 March 2018.
2) Caperdonich, single cask, Douglas Laing's, Old Particular, 312 bottles, refill hogshead, REF-DL9963, distilled June 1995, bottled August 2013, 18 years old, 48.4% abv.
The Bunna was slightly more golden than the pale gold Caperdonich.
The Bunna showed sweetness and custard overpowered by new make on the nose, while the Caperdonich was sweet with vanilla and fruitiness. The Caperdonich was quite gentel.
The Bunna had very little alcohol sting, while the Capardonich seemed a bit stronger with more sting even though it had a lower abv., but it was not overpowering.
In addition to the custard and new make, the Bunna showed some oakiness in the mouth. The aftertast was light and short.
The Caperdonich had a light and fruity tast. The aftertast was light and delicate, but short.
With water the Bunna lost the oakiness, but it didn't improve. The Caperdonich took the water very well and turned into pure delight - a candy store.
Conclusion: Both whiskies had the character of American oak. I could not find any hint of Noe sherry in the Bunna. The Bunna could have doubled for a three year old, while the Caperdonich had a lot of nice American oak fruitiness. A very good whisky.
One last comment: Gonzales Byass Noe solera casks are made of American oak. Without the charcoal the sherry cask was not able to remove the new make even after 14 years. In addition it was not able to give anything to the whisky to overpower the new make due to inactivity.
Even though I didn't find the Bunnahabhain any good, it was an interesting experience. I love the policy of bottling these 20cl samples. They give a good understanding of cask maturation.
Showing posts with label speyside. Show all posts
Showing posts with label speyside. Show all posts
Sunday, 7 October 2018
Don't be fooled by the cask
Labels:
american,
Bunnahabhain,
butt,
Caperdonich,
cask,
hogshead,
inactive,
Islay,
malt,
noe,
oak,
pedro ximenez,
refill,
scotland,
Sherry,
single cask,
single malt,
speyside,
whisky
Sunday, 17 December 2017
Glenfiddich - now and then
How is todays Glenfiddich 12 year old (L2B
7430 1708 08:37) compared to the Pure Malt (LA 4287 0106 42) edition of the
late 80’s and early 90’s? Since todays 12 year old is the successor of the Pure
Malt, you could expect them to be quite similar. Starting with the colour, you
get an indication of differences. The Pure Malt is much paler than the 12 year
old. After what I understand, the Pure Malt is eight to ten years old, but I
cannot find any big difference in maturity between the two.
I find todays Glenfiddich very fruity with
a prominent aroma of pears - almost artificially intense. The Pure Malt has
still pears, but with a nutty oily character. The Glenfiddich of today is light
drinking and very commercial. The old one is much more demanding, and I love it. I prefer the old one, but I think the new one is a better market match.
Labels:
glenfiddich,
malt,
Pure Malt,
speyside,
whisky,
William Grant
Saturday, 4 May 2013
Glenfarclas

I must admit that Glenfarclas is not my favourite whisky, but among the four candidates I would prefer the 21 years old.The 15 years old is not to my tasting.
But if you like a light sherried, fruity, floral and butterscotch whisky, Glenfarclas is a good choice.
|
Glenfarclas 15Y
|
Glenfarclas 21Y
|
Glenfarclas 25Y
|
Glenfarclas 40Y
|
Abv.
|
46 %
|
43 %
|
43 %
|
46 %
|
Colour
|
Gold (1)
|
Amber (3)
|
Dark gold (2)
|
Dark amber (4)
|
Light smoky
|
2
|
3
|
Lightest (1)
|
4
|
Sherry
|
Lightest (1)
|
Distinct (3)
|
2
|
Distinct (4)
|
First impression
|
Decay, butterscotch
|
Tropical fruit
|
Floral
|
Linoleum, dried
fruit
|
Fruitiness
|
Light fruity, peach
|
Tropical fruit
|
Fruity, light peach
|
Dried fruit, prunes,
raisins
|
Other
|
Light floral
|
Vanilla, light spice
|
Sweetness
|
Tobacco, leather,
spice, furniture polish
|
Finish
|
|
Salt, wood
|
|
Dry, tannins
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)